We – in our infinite space issues in a silly combination of words and actions in the empty hints, in good regard, anger and compassion We kind, full of hope, merznuschie at bus stops and indifferent We have long otvykshie see the wonder in small things, to find goodness in a hidden We, with our empty internal world. We who understand this coveted "want" and a mandatory "must" We, someone neglected, misunderstood, abandoned we do when we shall not know, the past past we in our infinite loneliness We take for granted the simple little ambition of happiness and the desire to rule we in our few good gusts and constant misunderstanding we hundreds of years and have not learned forgive We play different roles in performances under the working title of "Life" We remain forever secret and we – a short word with great value.. .
For Richard Rorty the majority of what we know on the superior and privileged member of the Metaphysical oppositions is a question of effect of contrast with the inferior and rejected member. We will be able some time to make better of what Parmnides made. The misticismo, or the negative way, or sacred silence wittgensteiniano, seems to be the only options. The kantiano contrast between the fenomenal and the numenal is one another vulgar example of this type of problem. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Dr. Caldwell B. Esselstyn, Jr. on most websites. It needed the nmenos, of thing-in-itself, to give sensible to its allegation of that the world espcio-weather was fenomenal, mere apparent. As well as the form in Aristotle and the infinite in Spinoza. The positivista language, the call formal way of the speech, is more satisfactory because it deals with the inteligibilidade as a property the linguistic expressions instead of things.
It in this manner converts metaphysics into philosophy of the language, approaching it of the description of Derrida of the dream in mago of the philosophy. Gianni Vattimo (1936) if occupied of the hermeneutic ontologia contemporary, accenting its linking with the niilismo – understood as weakness of the ontolgicas categories. Thus, he opposes the weak thought, a particular form of niilismo, to the diverse forms of strong thought, that is, those basing on the Christian revelation, the marxism and other systems ideological. According to Vattimo, from the philosophies of Nietzsche and mainly of Heidegger, a irreversible crisis in the cartesian and racionalistas bases of the modern thought restores. It considers a philosophy based on the weakness of the being as key of reading of after-modernity, but also on the forms of gradual reduction of the violence, ticket regimes democratic politicians, of secularizao, pluralism and tolerance, as impulse to the emancipation human being and the overcoming of the social differences. Its proposal philosophical is a reply to the crisis of great philosophical chains of centuries XIX and XX: the hegelianismo with its dialectic, the marxism, the fenomenologia, the psychoanalysis, the estruturalismo.
BRAVERMAN emphasizes that merchandise and currency establish interchange of relations in capitalist production, but that the rocks angular are the sales and purchase of force of 12 work. For in such a way, it affirms, three basic conditions become generalized: initially, the separation of the workers of the ways with which the production is carried through (they only can have access to these means of production vendendo its force of work) 13; after that, the freedom of the workers whom it makes possible to them to make use of its force of work; finally, the intention of the job of the worker becomes it expansion of a unit of the pertaining capital the employer. These three conditions demonstrate that the work process starts through a contract that stipulates the conditions of sales of determined force of work for the worker and its respective purchase for the employer. The diligent one firms the contract because another alternative of survival does not remain it. The employer wants to extend its unit of capital and for in such a way he does not hesitate in converting part of this capitalem wages.
This relation, however, it demands some reflections. The work, as any vital process is inalienable of the individual. Thus, as it is not possible to drink, to eat or to sleep for another person, also it is not to separate to muscles or brain to it of people. Of this form the employer cannot assume itself of the capacity of work of the worker, he lucratively holds back but it to fixes it in the work. He has a historical character in this phenomenon. The sales and purchase of the work force already occurred in the 14 seniority, but after century XIV wage-earning workers they had only started to appear with bigger emphasis in the Europe. They had become significant and numerically important after the advent of the Industrial Revolution, in century XVIII, under the regency of different relations of the found ones in the mercantilism, marked for the exchange of exceeding products.
Be sure to record it, at least on my mobile. And then try to give him a detailed answer, or at least delve on the issue on the Internet. I am sure you will find many interesting, finding answers to such questions have arisen spontaneously. Provoke others to ask questions. Answers to unusual questions posed by another person, the best "exercises for the mind." The more you answer these questions, the better Your mind works in unusual situations. Voicing their opinions, ask the point of view of those present.
Perhaps their views differ from yours and their arguments, you can find something useful that will complement your picture of the world. If you ask "stupid question", try to answer it as soon as possible intelligible. Not "dismiss" on such issues. Never stick man "labels" such as "boring", "curious" "Abnormal". At Neil deGrasse Tyson you will find additional information. This will hurt first of all you! Since you just eventually cease to communicate. And you will no longer develop.
Learn to rejoice in the discoveries, even the most simple. After all, the brain, receiving positive reinforcement from new force begins generates questions to help you explore the life around. "What is it? What are its functions? Who invented it? Why? Where does it come from? How is it invented? Where? When? Why is it called? As yet it can be I use it? ", etc. Do not be afraid to make a mistake or seem "stupid". "Better to seem like a silly one minute, asking the question than to remain silent and keep them for life" – the wise speak Chinese. To deepen your understanding Nancy-Ann_DeParle is the source. Doubt everything, even in the most usual "things." Our modern world is changing very rapidly. And many familiar repose is not working as effectively as before. 'No thing should not cease to be questioned Never lose the holy sparks curiosity. " Albert Einstein learned, or rather finding a habit to live in constant study, you simply converts. Your life will never be boring. Such a person will not miss a deaf ear to any fresh information he is constantly learning and cultivators, always in search of something new. Because such people are very quick to find solutions to their, and others too, problems: when you're full of good ideas, much easier to find your way out from a difficult situation. Even in such a situation that other people feel hopeless.
Confirmation can be found in history. Almost two thousand years people believed that everything revolves around the Earth, this is the essence geocentric system of Ptolemy. People such as Dr. Mark Hyman would likely agree. Much effort has been spent, how clever speeches uttered in defense of this system. However, practice shows that truth manifests itself over time. The time has come, and Copernicus, moved to a more global system, the heliocentric. Mankind has realized that wrong, in fact the earth revolves around the sun.
To date, development we will be closer to the truth, if the reference system, we take Metagalaxy (observed by mankind of the universe), since the universe is revealed to us so far only in the assumptions. In the frame of reference "humanity" it seems that we are alone in the universe, and no signs of other civilizations. Nowhere in the space we have not seen the works of more advanced civilizations. No clear evidence aliens visiting Earth. Brothers in mind, we find no can, although more than half a century Listened space in different wavelengths, we photograph a lot of space telescopes objects, alas, no one is rushing to give us news about yourself. About the lack of evidence advanced civilizations exist "Fermi paradox". Heavy Duty civilization must master the entire galaxy. Hence, in the solar system must exist traces of their activities. The essence of the paradox that the characteristics should be, but they are not. One reason for the silence Metagalaxy is that people, according to its surrounding media, looking mostly in the past, which significantly reduces the possibility of contact.
What it guarantees that the wax is the same one is its more essential characteristics, extension, flexibility, immutability For the imagination it can idea of some forms that this wax can assume, but the imagination is limited until certain point, rank not to be possible to imagine the infinity of forms that the wax can take. What it is the extension? : it cannot be known by the imagination, but by the agreement example of the wax where if it knows by means of an inspection of the spirit (imperfect and confused or clear and distinct), as the attention if directs more or less to the things that exist in it and of which she is composed. It is led to think that for happiness if it knows the wax for the vision; however an analogy to show that the vision finishes for depending on the college to judge: he sees men passing in the street with hats and coats, these could be specters or fictitious men, however, judge themselves that they are true men. What it has of essential in the wax must be apprehended through the spirit, not for the directions. The wax (the objects in general) while it is thought. To know the things of the spirit is more easy than the corporal things, rank to be the last knowledge of this dependent of the first ones. On the spirit the conception of the bodies depends.
Third Meditation: Of God; that it exists. 1 the 5 Pretende to make familiar itself I obtain: it is a thing that thinks, it doubts Which is the criterion to take it certain of some thing? : General rule All the conceived things clear and distinct is true. Exactly having been ece of fishes in doubt, the things perceived for intermediary of the directions, he is clearly and distinct that the ideas and thoughts of such things if present to the spirit.
Which is not its happiness when evidencing and to prove the veracity of its hypothesis. the scientific truth if installs. Installed the scientific truth the ones are not few that if prop up in its affirmation without if giving account of the fragility of this support. So soon another researcher if gives the work to remake the process, the initial truth is ece of fish in check. New research, new discoveries and what it sobrou of really? Kepler, Galileu, had among others caused agitation when they destronaram the religion, affirming the sun as center of cosmo. They had demonstrated that to a land ' ' navega' ' around of the sun and not contrary it. But they were only partially correct, therefore sun is only plus one astro in cosmo, also if moving? or being moved? for a universal force.
E, in accordance with Einstein, in a great cosmic movement. Truths that if had imposed, but that they had been surpassed. It was a tremendous advance Louis Pasteur to announce the possibility to kill bacteria with the pasteurizao process. Super heating and fast cooling. Or, in the medicine, the process of sterilization. One hundred degrees would be the definitive point to eliminate the bacteria. This is? or it was? a scientific truth: The high temperature (one hundred degrees) eliminates bacteria. But, sad sina of science: here, its results had one more time been ranks in check.
Researchers had demonstrated, in recent years, that in the volcano neighborhoods bacteria exist that if ' ' divertem' ' in temperatures above of one hundred degrees. this knocks down the scientific thesis of that the one hundred degrees eliminate the bacteria. thus if in them presents the question again: what it is really? Neri de Paula Sheep? Master in Education, Philosopher, Theologian, Historian. He reads more: ; ; ;