The Romans felt attracted by the domestic life; aspect characteristic of this civilization. The woman was the companion and cooperator of the Roman man; she was with him in the receptions and the banquets; thing that stops the Greeks was scandalous. The Roman woman shared with her husband the authority on her children and the crew members and participated in the public life of him. Abraham Maslow wanted to know more. With the marriage the Roman woman acquired a relative freedom of life; unlike the Greek woman who happened to be locked up in house of her parents, to be locked up in house of its husband. In Rome two forms of marriage existed: 1) ” conventio in manum” ; it forms older in the one than the woman came to comprise of the family of the subject husband to her marital power. That is to say, the woman was in condition of daughter, in which she had to do with the successory rights of family and.
This bond was realised of three ways: ” confarreatio” ; rite sacrum in its origins reserved to the patricios; in which the marriage had to divide bread piece of wheat during the nuptial sacrifice; ” coemptio” , it was the sale of the wife who in the antiquity was real, but soon was symbolic; by which the father transmitted to the husband his power of right on the woman to which he fell; and third he was ” usus” ; it was the coexistence of the spouses by a year;in a moment he fell in disuse. 2) ” sine manu ” or he frees.The wife continued belonging to the paternal family and conserving the successory rights of the origin family. It was not a formal marriage, its foundation was based on the coexistence of the spouses while its consent lasted to consider like husband and woman. The second nuptials of the woman, thus outside for being widow, was repudiada by the public opinion. Having a single husband was sight as feminine virtue and informed in the inscription of its tomb like honor title. In the section ” Entretenimientos” of, besides other subjects you will find ” The 10 Principles for a Felz” Marriage;.